OK.

Landover Baptist was good.

This? Not so much.

Try harder next time, Skippy.

Oh, now it was Noah's flood?

I thought the flood was Gods and just the boat was Noah's.

Wow, that Noah was one sadistic motherfucker. I have a whole new respect for the Bible now.

Damn Glog...

be prepared before you post, my anti-dinosaur jew brothers. it seems all of our 'evidence' has been disproven here. our feeble science has been rendered too weak to hide behind, not unlike NIgel Stubbingwicke, our atheist plant, 'who deep inside was weak since he did not have the Love of Christ to succor him and give him strength.'

shit.

heh... '<img srs=http://...'

Linkswarm.com: Our fists find their mark as if by Divine guidance

I guess none of you read this? If so, I think you would have a lot of unanswered questions... why don't you engage in a logical dialogue and think critically about the story. It is really clear that evolutionists like Stubbingwicke will go to whatever end just to prove their end, even when it is so wrong as in this case. That is what I deal with every day, is disbelieving people like Clevus and Stubbingwicke. Can't you just look at both sides of an argument and make a logical decision, versus just assuming that everything that subscribes to a evolutionist viewpoint is true?

Who is this Glog clogging the internets? He keeps talking but it all sounds like Charlie Browns teacher.....

'Nigel Stubbingwicke' is a hilariously well done fake name.

As I engaged him in fisticuffs,

lol

the guy does exist.

he even rebukes the story on his site

I thought he was Spinal Taps first drummer. Who knew?

he even rebukes the story on his site

hahah this makes it even funnier.

- Copyright © 2004 c.e. Nigel Stubbingwicke -

Oohh, what a burn!

haha...what a load of tripe

glog: why don't you engage in a logical dialogue and think critically about the story.

Why don't you kiss my ass.

The logical conclusion is
A) you're gonna believe what you wanna believe
B) the two related versions of this safari are both less than truthful , quite like FOX news' reporting. Inflated Opinions(mostly of themselves)

I love how quick creationists are to decry scientific method as an evolutionists evidence, while clinging to an ancient, re-re-re-re-re-re-re-translated text(s) of questionable validity for their own. And yet they still insist evolutionists don't do enough legwork.