Brilliant.

P.S. Did you know that your own bowels

I reject reality and substitute that which makes my faith-based belief system seem slightly less ridiculous and backwards than any intelligent person can discern it as being.

P.P.S. I hope that some readers might get a chuckle out of this story. The same Sunday (15 June 2008) that you and some of your acolytes were posting and promoting scurrilous attacks on me and our research (wasn’t that a bit disrespectful of the Sabbath?), I was in a church attending a wedding. And do you know what Old Testament lesson was read? It was Genesis 1:27-28, in which God created Man and Woman. It’s a very simple and lovely story, and I did not ask any questions, storm out, or demand the evidence that it happened as written at a time when science did not yet exist. I was there in the realm of spirituality and mutual respect, not confusing a house of religion for a science class or laboratory. And it was a beautiful wedding, too.

That, friends and neighbors, is the MEAT of the matter.

chock full o' gold!

It is as though a person thinks that God must have the same limitations when it comes to creation as a person who is unable to understand, or even attempt to understand, the world in which we live.

and

P.P.P.P.S. I noticed that you say that one of your favorite articles on your website is the one on “Deceit.” That article begins as follows: “Deceit is the deliberate distortion or denial of the truth with an intent to trick or fool another. Christianity and Judaism teach that deceit is wrong. For example, the Old Testament says, ‘Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.’” You really should think more carefully about what that commandment means before you go around bearing false witness against others.

I have a new hero!

'Several of your acolytes have pointed this out to you, and that your motives are unclear or questionable at best, but you and your cronies dismissed their concerns as rants and even expelled some of them from posting on your website. [Ed.: citation omitted due to spam filter] '

LOL! Give me a fucking break!

/quotes entire letter

This was good.

[Ed.: citation omitted due to ...uh... SPAM FILTER ...yeah, that's the ticket]

Unfortunately, there are essentially no real scientists left.

I refuse to believe that Jesus was a Jew. This science shows him to be a pure bred Scot. Right?

Those aren't real Conservatives. They're flag fucking God-selling Neocons. Jesus was a Mexican landscaper.

-capital C conservative
-hates women
-uses the term 'limousine liberal'

putting this here so i can add to the list later

Enjoy.

By the way, I'm not a 'capital C Conservative'.

Those aren't real Conservatives.

could have fooled me

Now I want prewf of god.

My god is 80 proof.

owned by science?

This proves that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Nothing like assuming that because you had several high school science classes that you are suddenly an expert in science. The arrogance and stupidity.

I can only hope that Schaftly gets gang raped by some animal armed with a humongous, genetically-evolved cock.

Jayeffsee (if you are evn listening),

The rules of science are plainly skewed to discredit those with religious beliefs. It is merely by the manipulation of the biases of the scientific method that scientists show their proof. Whatever method to achieve these results in an error-controled way negates the critical role of divine intention. Science has no basis in faith and faith is a given to us believers. Most likely, these results are just distortions by the forces of evil. No one can see these changes taking place or knows how they are taking place even if you can see them. Only faith can truly explain the success of this study and science only seeks to discredit faith.

Dear Glog,

As a scientist, I can honestly say that my methodology and approach has never, ever been to discredit religion. As a matter of fact, most scientists are searching for much more than you can ever imagine (reads some greater creator).

Fortunately for most evolutionists, you are a perfect representative of the creationist camp. It really isn't a fair, intellectual fight.

glog: 'The rules of science are plainly skewed to discredit those with religious beliefs. It is merely by the manipulation of the biases of the scientific method that scientists show their proof. Whatever method to achieve these results in an error-controled way negates the critical role of divine intention. Science has no basis in faith and faith is a given to us believers. Most likely, these results are just distortions by the forces of evil. No one can see these changes taking place or knows how they are taking place even if you can see them. Only faith can truly explain the success of this study and science only seeks to discredit faith.'

Actually glog, faith is the tool of the anti-Christ. Beliefs unsupported by the evidence of reality, that thare inconsistent with the Word of God manifest in His Creation, are beliefs founded in faith that deny the Truth of the supremacy God.

God has no need to intervene in his Creation; such intervention presumes error. God has no need to prove the validity of His creation, or His existence; they are valid regardless of our belief in them.

Satan, in his vanity, requires faith. It is only through the denial of reality, that Satan can claim supremecy. Men must exercise an act of willful belief, in contradiction to verifiable and empiricle fact to accept Satan's supemacy--they must have belief in conradictions to the Word of God manifest in His Creation, to deny the supremacy of God.

Faith: the Denial of the reality of God's Creation, is Satan's shackles on the minds and free will of men. Rejecting faith, is the first step in opening your mind to God, and rejecting Satan.

Damn Loki! That's good shit. I'm going to use it and say it was my idea. If it's OK with you...

Yep, that E. Coli makes for a real interesting read.

loki schools glog, very good

glog: you are either blatantly pulling my pisser, or actually believe in what you have said.

Either way, I have no time for you.