|
| |
|
|
US and Canada 'have signed a Civil Assistance Plan that allows the military from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a civil emergency.'
|
|
|
|
Alpha votes: 0 by sikki_nixx 0 by nocal , i agree to help my neighbor if his house floods. WE ARE FORMING A NEW WORLD ORDER!!!!!!!! 0 by nurgleming +1 by casmhar , yay, we get both canadian tanks +1 by coknurmowth , WOW +1 by jwalker +1 by wotak , the foil hat union X by KingOf7 |
| |
| < View The World 80x Slower |
FCC Questioning Comcast About Manip+ > |
| | | | | | isn't that illegal i thought only congress can sign treaties with foreign nations | | | |
| | | | | | | Lucky bastards. They get to be pals with the hated infidels!!!
More folks for Bin Laden to hate !!!
When the globe melts some more, I understand they will have some sweet cropland. I spent my youth in Ohio, on the lake shore, and my favorite radio station of all time came from London, Ontario.
I have served with Canadians,and they're cool. Niagra Falls sucks,but that didn't stop me from going like 3 times.
I just think that they are going to get exploited by the US. The US has run its military into the ground, and now we need CANADA to protect us? Fuck.
Blah, blah, Cannot believe the world , blah ,blah, btw the countdown has begun. | | | |
| | | | | | | isn't that illegal
The US is already in a treaty (and allied) with Canada - NATO.
Plus they never call it a treaty. | | | |
| | | | | | | plus it's not like we don't go around congress in order to wage every war we get into | | | |
| | | | | | | Yeah there has been a somewhat less-official version of this since well before WW2, I can think of a few instances where this has been the case. I just don't think that it was publicly spread about.
--911 (Canook fighter squadrons mobilized, air-bases were opened and all northern based air traffic was routed to Canada. Your citizens were basically detained until processed and billeted).
--OKA/Akwasasnie standoff (A group of militant Mohak natives set up roadblocks and clashed with cops, I remember seeing US reservists patrolling access points).
--Forest Fires and other natural disasters (We help out with this all the time).
| | | |
| | | | | | | On the other hand, Clinton and Obama would renegotiate NAFTA, or plain old 86 it.
http://news.sympatico.msn.ctv.ca/TopStories/ContentPosting.aspx?feedname=CTV-TOPSTORIES_V2&showbyline=True&newsitemid=CTVNews%2f20080227%2fdems_nafta_080227
You've probably got a better link to this LK. | | | |
| | | | | | | I for one welcome our new alien overlords. | | | |
| | | | | | | --911 (Canook fighter squadrons mobilized, air-bases were opened and all northern based air traffic was routed to Canada. Your citizens were basically detained until processed and billeted).
shhhh don't mention this in a shitbox link | | | |
| | | | | | | Its a conspiracy. Of Love. | | | |
| | | | | | | ....and a whole lot of reads.
Probably just Nocal refreshing the page though, waiting for someone else to comment. So he can comment, again, and again. | | | |
| | | | | | | everything's a conspiracy to you, you dumbass.
i thought racist ron paul supporters only cared about the border between us and mexico? you know, like how ron paul talks about that mexican superhighway that's going to run through america, but has been completely debunked? just like most of his phoney baloney racist horseshit | | | |
| | | | | | | Everything you say is insightful, coherent, and witty.
Just kidding. I win. | | | |
| | | | | | | you agreed with ron paul's racist sentiments.
i think that whoever wins, you lose. | | | |
| | | | | | | K. I'm calling you out.
For being as vocal and as guitar_jon-omnipresent as you have been lately I still don't think you've ever expressed your opinion. I suppose you just enjoy getting a rise out of people? I don't know where you stand on anything and I suppose it would be a stretch to say I was interested in your opinions, but you gotta give us something.
You seem only to criticize others opinions while withholding your own.
This makes you seem like a spineless pussy.
For the record I am not racist, I don't really care if you( or anyone else in internet land) thinks otherwise. I will attempt to explain my Ron Paul infatuation to you though.
I support Ron Paul because he is the best canidate we have for president. If he did make racist comment in the past or had his name on some rascist-fagwhite newsletter I don't really give a fuck, because he represents my views better than any of the other 3 remaining candidates.
I do not agree with his immigration views. As I understand it the portion of the US you and I inhabit WAS Mexico 'till our ancestors (yours more than mine you Catholic fuck) raped/murdered/converted the natives into submission. So I'm pretty much for all out amnesty, for all immigrants.
Sometimes, we are so conditioned as Amercians that the truth
seems like the conspiracy. | | | |
| | | | | | | I suppose it would be a stretch to say I was interested in your opinions
This makes you seem like a spineless pussy.
cool so i'm either a spineless pussy or a pedantic windbag to you. how about this: you clearly don't give a fuck about what i believe, so i won't explicate. i think that's fair, because who really wants to read a wall of text from me at any point? the ron paul thread is evidence of that. besides that, if you actually gave a fuck, maybe you'd ask about, you know, one aspect of my beliefs. i don't suppose i would be able to write about all of them.
For the record I am not racist
not going to dig it up from the stupid ron paul thread, but (and i'm paraphrasing, of course) you said that even if ron paul wrote those things, you tend to agree with them. i'll revise what i said earlier: you are not a racist. you tend towards racism.
you people are just so uncritical. for someone who supposedly sees conspiracy around every corner, you believe the rantings of a man who knows his kooky demographic as being scared of beaners. ron paul either deliberately does these things, or he has showed incredible and consistent poor judgment, which you seem to think should not disqualify him from your silly support.
the reason i got in the ron paul thread in the first place isn't because i hate ron paul's politics, at least not all of them. i just get tired of you, or loki, or whoever saying shit as though it were true. i'm the type of person that hears something on tv, or said by a person, and i have to go look into it myself.
what amazes me about you in particular is that you willingly discount scientists, engineers, and firefighters in favor of 9/11 no-names who run a website. you discount something like factcheck.org for something that ron paul says (well, theoretically, if we're talking about this silly little SUPERHIGHWAY crock of shit); ron paul has an agenda (votes), while factcheck.org has no reason to distort the issue. unless...only you know the truth! no first world nation is on a gold standard...but you know it works!
i just won't sit back and let assertions go unchallenged, and i don't see why i should. i don't really see why you don't.
(PS i'm not catholic, wasn't raised catholic, and have no practicing catholics in my extended family, but don't let that cognitive dissonance bother you! 420 smoek weed man) | | | |
| | | | | | | Another gallivanting 'are conspiracies maybe real?' thread. | | | |
| | | | | | | With a refreshing 'nocal is a fucken wanksta' twist! | | | |
| | | | | | | Without wasting a moment of my time to do the research, I support nocal's desire to call people out who state opinion as fact, which is a turn we all do, but for some to a lesser degree. Without getting into a right/center/left argument, I will credit the right with perfecting this tactic into an art form in the past ten or so years. Clear indicators: 'Well regardless, the fact of the matter is..... or repeatedly stating opinion as fact, until your brain either shuts down/ignores or embraces. We in the US, on the most part, have always been and continue to be a nation of people that are too fucking lazy/scared/incapable/ignorant to lead a life of examination. Not to say that all those who possess an opinion counter to mine have reached that point by mindless adoption, but on the whole, I know very few that really process info to reach their conclusions. Most of the time, they glom onto an opinion that has been processed into fact. Fuck, I did it with the Iraq war, and on that count I failed.
Thanks for reading my opinion. Please don't mistake it for fact.
| | | |
|
Hey. You. Yeah, you, anonymous person. If you logged in, you could comment, you know...
| | |
| Sexual Asspussy | This is awesome.
This is the first pornsite I've found in years that I'd actually advertise to swarmers. When you first load it up, it looks just like every crappy scam site out there, except that it's real. It's huge, it's updated constantly, there's no spam, no popups, and no bullshit -- and it's completely free. When you sign up through that link above and respond to the confirmation email, I make a bit of loose change.
See what other swarmers have to say about it. People love this place, so I feel fine about sending you there and am confident you will enjoy boners.
|
|
| My God, It's Full of Azron |
|
|
|