Where did you get that headline from? The Daily Mail? Fox News?

From Uart's bag o' tricks.

The court ruled that there were 9 MAJOR errors of fact in the movie, and that the movie was essentially partisan propaganda, rather than science.

That's funny that you would capitalize your adjective so breathlessly. I find the word 'minor' used in post-court analyses far more often than the word major. The court itself didn't conclude that the movie was factually wrong on any grand basis.

Does your bag of tricks have a picture of Gore's face with a big red circle-and-slash?

not yet... but it could...

bonus reading material:

'Gore told the world in his Academy Award-winning movie (recently labelled 'one-sided' and containing 'scientific errors' by a British judge) to expect 20-foot sea-level rises over this century. But his Nobel co-winners, the IPCC, conclude that sea levels will rise between only a half-foot and two feet over this century, with their best expectation being about one foot - similar to what the world experienced over the past 150 years.'

And some more...


'ONE of the world's foremost meteorologists has called the theory that helped Al Gore share the Nobel Peace Prize 'ridiculous' and the product of 'people who don't understand how the atmosphere works'

'It bothers me that my fellow scientists are not speaking out against something they know is wrong,' he said. 'But they also know that they'd never get any grants if they spoke out. I don't care about grants.'