Division Bell, chief.
I was unimpressed by the article, particularly for Rolling Stone. Precious little new information here, and the writer groans through it like an intern who's just been handed a shitty fluff assignment by his editor. He does some perfunctory research, hits the major points of the band's career, including the well-documented rifts between the members, then tries to tie it all up in some sentimental testimony to Syd Barrett.
Meh. Lownotes, and any number of other Swarmers, could have done much better job.
