'It can no longer be successfully argued that a blind person has 'meaningful access' to currency if she cannot accurately identify paper money without assistance,' Robertson wrote in his ruling.
I wish it could be successfully argued that the reason blind people do not have 'reasonable access to currency' has more to do with these people being blind rather than some (in)action bt the Treaury.
I wish it could be argued successfully that every individual has
some category and degree of disability, and that it is NOT the government's responsibility fix them for everybody; it's not a function of government to provide the handicaps for life. (+5 for money design considerations to you Mr. Wonder, because you're blind; -10 to you Mr. Hawkeye, you see too well.)
