'Nudity Not Necessary For Child Porn'

oh yes it is

However, crying is very necessary.

Um... Nudity is necessary for ANY PORN. That's why Maxim magazine is just a tease.

U.S. District Judge Tena Campbell rejected the arguments of Charles Granere and Matthew Duhamel, who are both charged with transportation, receipt and possession of child pornography in connection with operating a Web site that showed images of young girls in suggestive poses.

what sort of freak want's to see children in suggestive poses

It is the intent and suggestiveness of the pose, not the amount of clothing or other coverage that makes it porn, at least when the subject is a child. As the model gets older, the assumed sexual knowledge is greater, so the difference between porn and not-porn is greater.

COUNT ME IN TOO.