It's linked at the top of the story, y0

Excelant observations. The Christian Zeolots in this country are easily distracted. Gay marriage, abortion, Terry Sciavo(?), just to name a few subjects. Isn't it about time for us to be hearing about gun control again? Flag burning has been covered AGAIN.

President Bush has stuck it to Blair by refusing to look at the global warming crisis.

We are on the verge of replacing a Supreme Court Justice. (Maybe TWO)

THe White House 'outed' an American spy.

People are starving all over the world.

Oh yeah, our brothers and sisters are being killed in IRAQ.


I feel for the girls family, but the guy who wrote the article was right. There are VERY important issues we need to be looking at.......
Enough with the disractractions.

He opinion seems a little one sided. I agree with his main argument. He just detracts from his point by blasting Fox News. He sounds like a blubbering liberal fucktard, spewing the same rhetoric hes says he hates. Dont get me wrong, i HATE politicians period. I just think more people would read or maybe even agree with his article if he left out the hatered.

It's about the nature of the human herd mentality. Is it any better that they follow the religious instead of ____?

Think about it, who has their act together? The only show in town. It's not an endorsement by me, but if you look at what people follow and tend to believe it's got nothing to do with rationality--it's emotional manipulation and brainwashing that's gladly accepted.

They lack the capacity to be anything other than a herd.

Favorites include but are not limited to:

Subject: your actionable website

I am writing to inform you that i find your website unacceptable. It is an affront to decent people everywhere and totally unprotected by the first amendment.

--

From: Kelly Chronister

Didn't your Mother ever tell you... 'If you don't have anything nice to say.... then don't say anything at all'. YOU ARE A HEARTLESS BASTARD

--

Subject: NO BALLS!
Yeah if you had any balls you'd have signed your name. Whatever freak go find some other tree hugging problem to perseverate on! Or shall I say racially driven chip on your shoulder story!

I can't figure out which I like better: the guy who decides that the speech isn't going to be protected under the First Amendment (says who...?) or the mouth-breather who somehow mistook a cruel 'fuck this dead chick' article as the work of tree-hugging liberals.