bwhahhahhahhahaa

heh... this is actually getting some mainstream attention now:
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm

When was the last time they crashed a 757 into a high-rise steel building to test any of this theories?

Actually the WTC where made to withstand airplane crashes.
Hav e a Look

Further Reading
My favs are

• Insider Trading


• Maintenance Closing on the 8/9


• Bomb Sniffing Dogs taken away


• Silverstein owning to pulling Tower 7


• Both towers falling in about 10 secs each


• Un-dead hijackers


• People standing in the impact holes


• Firefighters talking about how the fires were mainly out


• Eyewitness account of explosions


• Firefighter accounts of explosions


• and on and on......

'Silverstein owning to pulling Tower 7'

what i don't get is how you 'pull' a building in 10 minutes. you need weeks of prep work for that.

yeah, lots of prep work...
2-3 floors of tower 7 were renovated into a reinforced bomb shelter.
Some 'theories' speculate that tower 7 was the command center (homing beacon) for the remote controlled planes.

go, goy, go

why is it that these whistle blowers always wait 'til four years later when everyone's already been sold on the 'official story' and will so easily dismiss them as disgruntled crackpots?

people have been blowing the whistle since the beginning, it's called media blackout.

On July '01, I was listening to Alex Jones. At that time I thought he was crazy and entertaining at best. During that show he was basically screaming mad and telling people to call the government / Pentagon to urge them not to carry out this 'fake-terror' attack, which his source at the Pentagon tipped him off to, I laughed and forgot about it. The warning didn't have a definitive date, but the event was to happen within next 3 months. I also believe a newspaper / source or two in France also tried to warn the U.S.

Most the crap can be discredit easily. Like how maybe they got the terrorists wrong. After all, they did all kinda blow the fuck up in a plane.

and I think they're might be a slight difference between 'designed' and 'tested and proven'. But that's just my crazy, logical thinking.

Yes...!!!
Because planes have never hit buildings before...!!!
And architects anticipating it is crap...!!!



Right???