' The weapon itself is called the DREAD, or Multiple Projectile Delivery System'

i'd like it if the designers of an awesome silent killing system were a bit less...confused.

Wow, what an asshat this 'inventor' is! Have you ever tried to aim a gyroscope at anything, especially one that has so much weight and such great speed of rotation? This, folks, is not something that a person can do. Gyroscopes resist change in orientation, which does not bode well for aiming at all. Additionally, if a person loses the grip on this weapon, its handles are bound to spin the opposite with lots of torque (even more so given the ratio of gyroscope's weight to that of its outer casing) and blow the gun carrier's brains out.

Also, this piss-for-brain should note that it would be pretty hard to engineer a gun that shoots out of the middle, just because the bullet will follow the trajectory that is tangential to the outer circumference of the disk, so in this design you'd be shooting forward from the etreme left or extreme right, depending on spin direction. And it will be mighty difficult to hit anything unless there's an aiming system to compensate.

And then there's the issue of disbalancing due to vibration. Even if bullets deplete from all of the sides of the disk evenly, there will always be a disbalance in weight distribution, making the gun vibrate along the axes parepndicular to that of rotation.

Which brings me to the final point, that this sucker will either jam badly or wear out fast. I have just imagined four or five designs of the barrel receptacle (which accepts the bullet from the disk and guides it forward), and I tell you, the chances are very high that either bullets will collide with walls and lose kinetic energy (thus wearing out the gun from the inside and losing range), or get stuck on the threshold between the spinning disk and the receptacle. Chances of this happening will only increase with the weapon lifetime, as the receptacle erodes from inevitable mis-alignment with the trajectory of the ball.

well O fuking kay then.

Crackalackin, that's a vigorous statement you have just made. I hope you are willing to eat 4.37 lbs of shit if you are ever proven rong.

Wow, did I ever misspel 'perpendicular' Whew, need to lay off the Dew gentlemen, it makes my trigger fingers twitchy

By imposing a reverse tangental spin on the barrel, the curve can be largely eliminated, as with rifling...

Ever hear of ballistics?

Crackalakin, (or just plain 'lakin')

Your analysis means nothing, as you are dead to me; you not showing in your own back yard for the BBP mutherfuker.

neH!

CHUT!

taht's a gun comrads? yourr enemy would die larffin beforre you managed to twat him down with teh golf ball ammo..

shit it anyways.. therre's a better deal a little lowerr on teh same page..

http://images.military.com/pics/ST_071205_timex.jpg

timeless classic.