I am confilicted about this.

I disagree with this decision based very much on Judge Thomas' dissent:

'“Any” court literally means any court, he wrote.

“Read naturally, the word ’any’ has an expansive meaning, that is, ’one or some indiscriminately of whatever kind,”’ Thomas said.'

Read naturally, '...right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed' means no licensing or registration of guns or gun owners; and I'm down with that.

On the other hand, the point about 'procedural protections are often less in international courts.'

Afterall, speaking dissent in some counties is a felony. Although a protected right in the U.S., should a felony conviction of suggesting that the local potentate is an asshat preclude you from owning a handgun?

I think not.

I convict you of making sense. I sentence you to more porn and television to rot your mind.

Acting as the court of appeals, I uphold this conviction. The sentence is commuted to time served, with any extension to be at the convicts discretion.

Yay fir L0ki. Please take yr handgun and thourougly shoot all commie scum and free market capitalist faggots to death.