• On MovieTome: DEVASTATOR in TRANSFORMERS 2?
August 16, 2008 12:20 AM PDT

The Bigfoot press conference and the art of selling a website

Posted by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Print

Updated to include more specific details of the two Bigfoot sites. And for all of you who don't like the way I spell the word 'unphased', please understand that I am allowed one Anglo spelling per month as part of my dual nationality. Here is a link to my hometown newspaper, the Birmingham Post. Hope this helps to ease the pain. And here's another link to ZDnet, which proves this freaky Anglicism has crept onto US shores. It is truly not my intention to analize (sic) the English language.

What was most revealing about today's exhilarating and highly truthful Bigfoot press conference was not what was said.

It was the headgear.

Emblazoned with the URL bigfoottracker.com, a site devoted to their own Bigfoot tracking enterprise, (a site, incidentally, that declares that Bigfoot's DNA has been taken away for 'analization'), the baseball caps worn by Matthew Whitton (aka Gary Parker) and Rick Dyer said so very much.

Their words on MSNBC's Countdown With Keith Olberman said it with a cleanliness only rivaled by Bigfoot's teeth. When asked by the lucky stand-in presenter, Rachel Maddow, whether they were out to make as much money as they could, Mr. Dyer, who had not uttered a word through the entire interview, firmly stated that this was the case. (Please take note, Mr. Zuckerberg and Ms. Sandberg)

These are businessmen who put most Web 1.0 enterprises to shame. Most of Web 2.0 too. They have a geneticist's rigorous grasp of detail. And they have a clearly articulated business plan.

Messrs Whitton and Dyer are afraid of nothing, certainly not of the world's press. After all, they have faced and sniffed the body of Bigfoot. They have dragged his five hundred pounds back to their pickup truck. They have resisted the urge of calling the police, or Animal Rescue. These are men smart and courageous enough to have run Webvan.

In their interview with Ms. Maddow, they were amusedly unphased. They stated their case. They insisted that, despite previous reports (that might well have been true), they weren't hunters at all, merely hikers who happened to come across an incredible find and even braved the circling of other Bigfeet who were perturbed to see the body of their blood brother being dragged away, like a large, hairy Lindsay Lohan, to a career in Hollywood.

But they have learned one thing about life- and specifically about the internet business. They don't just talk monetization. They do it wherever they are online. Their own site is surprisingly sophisticated, with products galore. And on another site, one owned by a Bigfoot tracker called Tom Biscardi, where their find and their faces are both heavily featured and, where one supposes, they might just be getting a cut, the merchandising just goes on.

If you hotfoot it to searchingforbigfoot.com, you can pick up an authentic SearchingForBigfoot cap, in black or white, for $24.99. (a BigfootTracker.com hat at Whitton and Dyer's own site goes for just $19.99) You can hitch up your trousers with a commemorative Bigfoot Lives pewter belt buckle, its price inexplicably reduced from $34.99 to $29.99. And for a mere $35 (reduced from $40) you can adorn your front porch with a Bigfoot Welcome Mat.

Were they hunters, which they avowedly are not, they might describe this as a great way to make a killing.

Of course, these products are merely loss leaders, because when the venerable scientists from Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan or Georgiastan confirm that Matt (aka Gary) and Rick are, indeed, in possession of a Bigfoot cadaver, searchingforbigfoot.com and bigfoottracker.com will rival Amazon and Fifth Avenue for traffic and profit. And they will rival Facebook on the engagement scale.

The possibilities are taller than some would accuse their story. Bigfoot perfume, Bigfoot dogfood, a Bigfoot steakhouse chain, perhaps even a Bigfoot blog from beyond the grave.

You see, it's not enough just to have a good idea, you have to have your business plan jingling with readiness.

I understand that the real reason today's press conference was held in Palo Alto is that the two intrepid businessmen had another meeting in the vicinity.

The Stanford Business School has already offered Messrs. Whitton and Dyer professorships. The two hikers from Georgia said they would think about it.

You see how clever they are?

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Should Microsoft buy itself some cool?
U.K. lawyers send porn download bills to upstanding citizens
Man with no arms caught driving car with his feet
Microsoft shuts down LeBron James
iLike? No, I don't
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 42 comments
by vivalaroma August 16, 2008 1:26 AM PDT
For a quintessentially "technically incorrect" approach w.r.t. the art of selling a website, check out "A slice of the mother's day market within easy reach" at http://trak.in/discuss/ and the comments-with-blinders at the auction site...
Reply to this comment
by txdeveloper August 16, 2008 6:20 AM PDT
Too bad the website is so heinous! They should have included a professional developer in that rockin' business plan!
Reply to this comment
by cnetblog August 16, 2008 7:15 AM PDT
All it takes to figure out how to create online business model that generarates revenue is to call companies who do that (like http://www.attention.cc/) for example - they even tell you on 1st page how to do it. So it is not that hard - what is hard is to get FREE traffic. And this is what bigfoot story does - creates FREE traffic that still has to be converted and monetized. Comparisons to volumes of facebook and youtube.com are amusing but very far reaching.
Reply to this comment
by antwawn August 16, 2008 8:38 AM PDT
The bigfoot they found was actually killed by a famous British hunter: http://tinyurl.com/5n82gx
Reply to this comment
by richiemgood August 16, 2008 9:41 AM PDT
BIgfoot? Where would you like me to put that bigfoot? OK, think about that a little. As for me ( http://www.currentnewsonline.com/2008/08/14/chupacabra-caught-on-tape/ ) . . . I'm going with the chupacabra story. . . . Bigfoot is 'so five minutes ago'. . . . Like I say, nessie is next ( psst ) pass it on.
Reply to this comment
by caw23 August 16, 2008 10:00 AM PDT
Interesting take but poor reporting Chris (unless you're using their hats as a metaphor.) I agree this is clever marketing but apparently you didn't actually bother to even read their hats from the presser or notice they wore none on Countdown so the hats apparently didn't do them THAT much good.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 16, 2008 10:57 AM PDT
Oh, I try not to do reporting, caw23....and I was, indeed, being allegorical.

However, just for you, I have amended the above to reflect what was actually on their hats. And yes, I know they didn't wear the hats on MSNBC, but I quite clearly say it was their words that enhanced the beautiful and spiritual intentions of their hats.

Sigh. I've already bought my cap. Haven't you?

Chris
by GuyBlaise August 16, 2008 5:09 PM PDT
All is a pure fabrication. As the Bangala of Congo say,?The lie can go upstairs taking the elevator. However, the truth that takes the stairs also gets there.?
http://guyblaise.com/
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 16, 2008 7:14 PM PDT
Guy,

That is a great quote. You will see it again in print one day.....

Thank you for that.

Chris
by Kreuzer33 August 16, 2008 6:35 PM PDT
$24.99 for a hat! Man, I am in the wrong business!!

http://kreuzer33.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/bigfoot-press-conference-revealsnothing/
Reply to this comment
by redwoodcoast August 16, 2008 7:54 PM PDT
Want real proof that Bigfoot lives? Watch this video shot in the Northern Calfornia redwoods this week. The L.A. Times calls it much more credible than the Georgia claim: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p22BGJ6dXU
Reply to this comment
by redwoodcoast August 16, 2008 7:55 PM PDT
Want real proof that Bigfoot lives? Watch this video shot in the Northern Calfornia redwoods this week. The L.A. Times calls it much more credible than the Georgia claim. Go to YouTube [dot] com [slash] redwoodcoaster
Reply to this comment
by t26l August 16, 2008 10:09 PM PDT
Unfazed. It's "unfazed," Mr. Professional Journalist, not (aargh) "unphased."
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 16, 2008 11:44 PM PDT
Ah, t261,

How lovely of you to comment. Are you familiar with the concept of dual nationality?
Here is an article from my hometown newspaper from today. Hope this helps to explain my sometime international flights of fancy:
http://www.birminghampost.net/midlands-birmingham-sport/west-midlands-sports/wolves-fc/2008/07/06/jody-craddock-unphased-by-arrival-of-stearman-at-molineux-65233-21272064/
by taxonomyst August 18, 2008 7:53 AM PDT
Yeah! And at least "analization" creates an interesting picture of what they should do with their so-called evidence, but "unphased" merely makes the writer sound ignorant.
by HAL 9K August 18, 2008 5:31 PM PDT
"Faze" vs. "phase"...

While it's true that there are regional (continental) variations in English
spelling, each considered correct within context (such as "color" vs.
"colour"), this is not one of those cases.

The verb "faze" [http://Middle English fesen, to drive away, frighten, from Old English f?sian.|http://Middle English fesen, to drive away, frighten, from Old English f?sian.]
has a different meaning, etymology and spelling from the verb "phase" [Greek phasis,
appearance].

This is true no matter what side of the ocean you may call home. Anyone who says
"phased" for "fazed" is simply in need of an education.
by franglais--2008 August 17, 2008 12:19 AM PDT
Really, their website is abominable ! Have they heard of variable width tables? Or as another poster suggested, hiring a pro?
And they're being offered teaching positions in a Business School?!
Blimey!
Reply to this comment
by ezdate123 August 17, 2008 8:26 AM PDT
well if bigfoot is real I am sure he would be using ezdate123 to find a mate... The forest can be pretty difficult to find that special someone since we have spent all these years and still have not found one bigfoot either dead or alive, Mike/ezdate123
Reply to this comment
by ezdate123 August 17, 2008 10:48 AM PDT
if he had any real photos he could sell them on a photo site like royalty free stock photo gallery and make some real money.....But as we all know this is just a big hoax....what a shame....
Reply to this comment
by davet210 August 17, 2008 1:33 PM PDT
"unfazed"
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 17, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
Please see my reply to t261.

Chris
by roonskapper August 17, 2008 2:30 PM PDT
Well lets set the record straight, Dyer and Whitton have their own website @ bigfoottracker.com, Searchingforbigfoot.com is tom biscardi's website and has been for YEARS, and he has always sold hats and other bigfoot related items! So maybe before you jump on the bigfoot hater wagon you should do some background research.
Reply to this comment
by seeingeyeseesall August 17, 2008 4:48 PM PDT
This is what we get when Britney takes her lithium and keeps her panties on...
Reply to this comment
by CrabbyGolightly August 17, 2008 4:49 PM PDT
Crabby speculates that this latest discovery might have had something to do with the million dollar reward offered in June by binocular manufacturer Bushnell and Field & Stream magazine. The two companies offered the joint reward to anyone who can "provide an unaltered photograph/video, verified and substantiated by a panel of scientific experts [including a zoologist and biologist], the evidence required to prove a Sasquatch/Bigfoot/Yeti exists."

But as LiveScience's "bad science columnist" points out, "This is, of course, a marketing promotion and not a genuine search for Bigfoot. There's no way to authenticate a Bigfoot photograph by itself; the image is simply a two-dimensional pattern of pixels. To truly prove a Bigfoot exists, you'd need corroborating hard evidence like a body, teeth, or bones."

Crabby predicts that today we will definitively learn one thing: where we can buy"Bigfoot for President" t-shirts.
CrabbyGolightly.com
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 17, 2008 4:54 PM PDT
Crabby,

Welcome. It's a pleasure to make your acquaintance and see that you bring us fine, interesting information.

I am also delighted that you are not objecting to my dreadfully anglicized spelling of 'unphased.'

Chris
by propwash44 August 17, 2008 4:51 PM PDT
I concur that their assertion that the DNA is in for ANALization (the proper term is ANALYSIS) is indeed hilarious, but I suggest that the writer double-check the applicability of the term "phased" as used in this report. The correct (and more appropriate) word is FAZED, as in "they weren't FAZED..."
Look it up in your Funk & Wagnalls.

These dudes are just doing what they should....PT Barnum describes this situation best.

dj
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 17, 2008 5:16 PM PDT
Oh, propwash44,

I explained to several commenters above, that, being of dual citizenship, I am allowed to use anglicisms occasionally.

really. please let me.

Chris
by ganderhook August 17, 2008 7:24 PM PDT
BIGFOOT is alive and well. He roams the hills of Southern Ohio and visits our hunt club very often and sacks out in our guest cabin. To see, click on lazyshuntclub.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
 See all 42 Comments >>
advertisement

In the news now

A tech veteran responds to the recession

LogLogic's Patricia Sueltz heard a clear message about the economy from investors, but she already knows a thing or two about navigating through tough times.


Obama's AG pick on privacy

Eric Holder has criticized the warrantless wiretapping program, but his views on other online policies may not be that far from those of the Bush administration.


Resource center from CNET News sponsors
Business. Ready.
Sony VAIO® Professional PCs.

Click Here!
A new grade in mobility demands a new kind of notebook. And Sony delivers.Tough, portable and featuring up to 7.5 hours of battery life! VAIO® Professional notebooks are built for business. Learn more.

Click Here!
Built tough for business.

Learn more about the rigorous quality testing Sony puts its notebooks through.

Protect your investment.

Find out why VAIO® tech support recently won a Laptop Editors' Choice Award, July 2008.

Long battery life.

Up to 7.5 hours of battery life! See how VAIO® PCs will keep you productive longer when on the road.

Travel light

Check out our ultraportable line-up, starting at 2.87 lbs.

PCs for every need.

Find out which VAIO® notebook is right for you.

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right