Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Return to sender

White House refuses to open email about regulating greenhouse gases

Posted by Kate Sheppard at 12:46 PM on 25 Jun 2008

Muckraker: Grist on Politics

The White House has refused to accept the Environmental Protection Agency's conclusion that greenhouse gases are pollutants that must be controlled, and has told EPA officials that the email they sent containing the document of their findings would not be opened, reports The New York Times. Apparently the email in question has been hanging in limbo since December 2007, according to EPA officials.

The document details the EPA's proposed response to the Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. EPA that greenhouse gases pose a threat to public health and the environment, and the EPA has a responsibility to regulate them. Apparently, the White House has decided if they don't open the email, they don't have to abide by the suggestions of experts.

According to those who have accessed early drafts of the EPA's endangerment findings, the original conclusion was that the country could raise automobile fuel efficiency standards to 37.7 miles per gallon by 2018 without significant economic hardship. EPA officials, speaking under the condition of anonymity to the Times, said that over the past week the White House has put pressure on the agency to eliminate large sections of their analysis that support stronger regulation, including their finding that regulation of automobile emissions could actually produce $500 billion to $2 trillion in economic benefits over the next 32 years.

The Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on regulating auto emissions is expected as early as today. As we've reported previously, documents that Congress has secured related to the case suggest that the White House intends to undermine the EPA's recommendations in the ANPR. EPA officials say that the ANPR out of the White House will be a watered-down version of their recommendations that looks at the legal and economic concerns related to declaring carbon dioxide a pollutant.

The original proposal from EPA experts "showed that the Clean Air Act can work for certain sectors of the economy, to reduce greenhouse gases," one senior official told the Times. "That's not what the administration wants to show. They want to show that the Clean Air Act can't work."

As we've seen previously with the smog decision and the California waiver, Johnson has a history of ignoring the recommendations of staff experts in order to appease the White House. The Times notes that one EPA official has already resigned over the apparent politicization in the agency when it comes to regulating emissions. Jason Burnett, the associate deputy administrator, told the Times he resigned because "no more constructive work could be done" there in response to the Supreme Court decision.

As we've reported previously, House Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming Chair Ed Markey sent a letter to Bush yesterday urging him to abide by the recommendations of the EPA. And on Friday, the White House intervened to block the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee's subpoena of documents related to the White House's role in decision-making on related issues at the EPA, claiming executive privilege.

If the White House won't open this email...

how about something a little more 19th century, like a snail-mail letter? That does seem to be more their style.

"Monty Python

And the Holy Grail"'s line.  "Run away, run away!"  Basically explains the bush administration on any serious issue.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Spring it on 'em

Get somebody from the WH in front of a Congress committee and hand them the document.

If the Justice Dept can serve notice on people, I'm damned sure a document can be delivered with proof to a known address in Washington DC.

Executive privilege. What a joke.

Good grief...

...and I thought James Watt and Gail Norton were bad. Amateurs, just amateurs, compared to this corporate whore. Jon Stewart ripped this clown a new the other night. So funny I wanted to slap somebody else in the head.

The mellotron is your friend.
Bushy's fed chairman

Is hiding too.  Now the wall street talking heads are saying he needs to raise rates to support the dollar...  to bring oil down.  No fed action, Bernanke only acts when hedge fund "banks" need a bailout.

The idiot that interviewed Sen Cantwell yesterday says about electric cars, "the grid is already going down, how can we plug in electric cars?"

Check out this shill for gas guzzling trying to fence with Sen Cantwell.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=778278561&play= ...

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin

Head in the Sand

Wow. Isn't this just the classic definition of head in the sand behavior? If I can't see it, it doesn't exist.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks