main

Internet Explorer 7 Screenshots

lardiop   on 24 June 2005 - 23:33 · 112 comments & 76199 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Bink.nu has just posted some screenshots of what appears to be Internet Explorer 7 running on a version of Longhorn at Gnomedex. The screenies highlight some of the new RSS features scheduled to be put in IE7, and were obviously taken by a digital/phone camera. A video of IE7 highlighting RSS support can be streamed from Channel9 (~22 Minutes in for actual footage of IE7 on Longhorn)

Upon closer examination of the screenshots one can make out the basic layout of the new browser. Microsoft has added a search tool to the top right of the browsing window similar to the one found in Safari/Firefox. A single tab located directly above the menus appears to be running in each of the screenshots. Back/Forward buttons can be found on the top left of the screen with the home, favorites, history and what seems to be a RSS subscription button sitting down by the drop-down menus.

IE7 is scheduled to hit beta early this summer around the same time as Windows Longhorn. In an article posted on eWeek today, Microsoft revealed that RSS will be integrated into the heart of Longhorn. A representative commented that the company is "betting big on RSS" this time around and that "it needs to be in places other than readers and browsers."

Screenshot: Main Browser Window | RSS Subscriptions | RSS Display Panel | IE7 on XP?
View: Microsoft Channel9 Video | Screenshot | Screenshot 2 | Screenshot 3
View: Neowin Discussion | Bink.nu Article


Overview
mUSB flash drives are compact and easy-to-use devices that are similar in use to your computer hard drive. USB flash drives slip into your pocket, conveniently around your neck or on a keychain for ultimate portable storage. USB flash drives in 2005 can hold up to 4 gigs of data, which is over 1700 three-minute songs (66 hours) recorded as MP3s or about three times the content of a standard compact disc. If you share a computer, USB flash drives are a great way to store personal information. USB Flash Drives are also a great option for saving information and share it with others. When you have many things to save and share but you have a limited number of USB Flash Drives, you will need to backup the information and restore it when needed. This is where the Microsoft USB Flash Drive Manager application can help you. The Microsoft USB Flash Drive Manager will help you backup and restore presentation, pictures, songs and applications from and to USB Flash Drive devices and take them with you. The application can also help you to classify and name USB Flash Drives images (for instance "My network configuration" or "The pictures for my grandma") and lets you see this name whenever the USB Flash Drive is plugged into the computer.

Microsoft USB Flash Drive Manager is available for Windows XP only.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 112 additional comments
#1 Redfox Mcbeth on 24 Jun 2005 - 23:37
It'd be spiffy if I could actually see what the hell was going on.
(1 reply) #2 rm20010 on 24 Jun 2005 - 23:39
Hmm. Judging by the screenshot, the titlebars look better.
#2.1 em_te on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:40
From all the other screenshots I've seen of other Longhorn applications, the titlebars are merged with the toolbars to become one continuous section. So I guess it will be a default for new Longhorn applications. It looks similar to the brushed metal appearance on some Mac OSX applications.
(8 replies) #3 Lino en Kuldes on 24 Jun 2005 - 23:41
God, the RSS viewer screenies are just TOO MUCH LIKE Tiger's Safar 2.0 RSS... does MS ever get tired of ripping off?
#3.1 hotdog963al on 24 Jun 2005 - 23:45
Obviously not.
Anyway Apple's interface is perfect, so they have no choice but to copy it
#3.2 Digitalfox on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:19
Perfect??

Grow up, nothing is perfect...

And obviously Tiger's Safar isn't perfect..
#3.3 aristotle-dude on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:25
Of course Tiger's Safari is not perfect but that is a damn near carbon copy except there is no slider for article length.
#3.4 Lino en Kuldes on 25 Jun 2005 - 04:00
... which proves once again that even when Microsoft has the advantage of being able to even USE the competitor's software, they still don't improve upon it... typical Microsoft...
#3.5 elliot on 25 Jun 2005 - 07:39
Oh so you've used IE7 have you?
#3.6 Inplode on 25 Jun 2005 - 09:38
QUOTE
Anyway Apple's interface is perfect, so they have no choice but to copy it



ROFL wake the hell up
#3.7 Kushan on 25 Jun 2005 - 15:53
If it aint broke....
Look at the vast majority of programs out there, a hell of a lot of them are "copied" from something else, you know why? Because it works!
#3.8 shao on 27 Jun 2005 - 08:37
3.7 indeed. and of course, apple have NEVER copied ANYTHING from ANYONE have they. lol. pull the other one. they're the biggest fraudsters out there
#4 soothsayer on 24 Jun 2005 - 23:47
Sweet stuff (y)
(1 reply) #5 IndoShindo on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:02
Yeah looks like a ripoff of Safari, why not ripoff a browser that is more popular than Safari, ie. FireFox .. i guess thats IE Explorer 8
#5.1 em_te on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:42
The purpose of ripping-off an idea is to select the best idea. Not to select the most popular one. Unless of course it happens to be the best and the most popular.
#6 EduardValencia on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:04
minor differences make it different from safari,but well there is rip off in the whole concept
#7 Skyfrog on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:04
Looks like it's running on Longhorn; it probably isn't going to look like that on XP.
(1 reply) #8 thefunkymunky on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:09
The video link don't work.
#8.1 vetlardiop on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:27
Fixed
(1 reply) #9 soldier1st on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:16
at least ie 7 won't look like that garbage ie 6.5 in longhorn which i hate with a passion.it will look like firefox but thats better than the ie 6 look.
#9.1 elliot on 25 Jun 2005 - 07:41
Erm, what?
(2 replies) #10 PharosBR on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:29
I don't care if they copy Apple. It will be a more affordable Mac, I have nothing to lose
#10.1 kaiwai on 25 Jun 2005 - 05:02
You consider Macs expensive? bah ha ha thats good, very cute.

So I must be rich because I have an iMac G5!? god, thats even funnier.
#10.2 g_denne on 25 Jun 2005 - 05:41
Mac's are expensive, I do believe so. He said affordable, too, which is right. PC over Mac is moreso.
#11 Server.System on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:30
the Tabs bar looks a little to think for me, but i like the look over all.
(4 replies) #12 LTD on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:43
Ripping off?? Copying?? 'scuse me, but whatever isn't patented/closed licensed is FAIR GAME.

I'm sick of hearing all this "MS is ripping off Apple" garbage. Apple is trying to address consumer needs, and so is MS. You can imagine that this will take both companies into similar territory.

What is really sad is that a 93% market share competitior is matching a 4% market share dwarf nearly feature-for-feature . . . . . sad for Apple.

Welcome to REALITY, folks. It's called BUSINESS. Microsoft has been doing it well and smartly for years now.

As long as we get quality, I HOPE that Microsoft "rips off" as many features as it can. More power to them. We'll get a better OS as a result

Whatever 'aint nailed down is fair game. The strongest will survive, folks.
#12.1 minigun on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:57
:yes:
#12.2 PharosBR on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:57
Well said.
#12.3 PseudoRandomDragon on 25 Jun 2005 - 01:19
You're right, whatever isn't nailed down is fair game, but the practice of businesses ripping off ideas and making money off of it lead to mass software patents, which is a problem in itself.
#12.4 Philip Hristov on 25 Jun 2005 - 07:15
@LTD

I agree with you. We want quality!
(3 replies) #13 AeronPrometheus on 25 Jun 2005 - 00:57
Well let's see, it took Microsoft three years of patching the current version and they still don't have all the bugs squashed (and are refusing to take out a sizable ammount). A new IE with its own set of problems due to Microsoft's Coding standard, wonder how long it'll take them to bugfix this one 'till it's at an excusable level...

Not trolling, it's a serious inquisition on my part. When all Microsoft does is copy successful ideas from other people (Like companies they claim to be better off than) they'll always be a day late and a dollar short.
#13.1 elliot on 25 Jun 2005 - 07:52
Have you ever actually worked at microsoft? If not then stfu about their coding practises. IE6 is like it is because they stopped working on it.
#13.2 AeronPrometheus on 25 Jun 2005 - 21:03
"they stopped working on it." = Microsoft's coding standard.

Microsoft lacks the enthusiasm and the customer appreciation nessessary to convince me to believe that their software is better or worth supporting more than other company's software.

FireFox has been long since and looks to be ongoingly the best browser for Internet usability and security. But their view of me as a customer and (lack of a) desire to code properly goes far beyond IE.
#13.3 MrCobra on 27 Jun 2005 - 10:08
No browser is secure. Anything that lets you connect to the world outside will never be secure.

(4 replies) #14 Sphinx Myth on 25 Jun 2005 - 01:15
Hum...these screenshots only show the design of IE7...
But we're waiting for real changes like better W3C standards/CSS/PNG supports and bugfixes, not a new design...
#14.1 kerby on 25 Jun 2005 - 03:39
Correction, YOU'RE waiting for W3C standards/CSS/PNG supports and bugfixes.

I could really care less, websites make the webpages for the vast majority of users that will view it. And the vast majority is IE (no one is even close to IE)... so your standards arn't really looking to much like standards to me... The way IE renders a page is the standard, not what some lame organization says.

Flame me all you want.. its true. Oh but I use Firefox anyways
#14.2 Nichotin on 25 Jun 2005 - 13:55
Correction: Everyone that develops alternate browsers are waiting for IE to support the open standards that are out there.
Same goes for many web developers, who aim their sites at a mixed set of browsers. Of course, no browser implement the standards perfect, but at least they aim to do so. IE however, has been lacking a lot for a long time. What Microsoft has made is not a good standard, as it is not documented for others to use in any way.
#14.3 kerby on 26 Jun 2005 - 04:58
QUOTE
What Microsoft has made is not a good standard, as it is not documented for others to use in any way.


I never said it was a good standard, but it is the standard wether developers like it or not. And how many standards are actually well documented? And still the standards talk is crap, IE is the standard no matter what. You're just going to have to get used to it and stop complaining.
#14.4 Jugalator on 26 Jun 2005 - 17:39
QUOTE
Correction: Everyone that develops alternate browsers are waiting for IE to support the open standards that are out there.
Same goes for many web developers, who aim their sites at a mixed set of browsers.

Uuuh... And everyone who wish to be free to pick browsers without having some sites look like crap?

I have absolutely no idea why kerby doesn't care...

Having IE define the standards will definitely not improve his Firefox browsing experience anyway.
#15 mx3 on 25 Jun 2005 - 01:32
They really can't win. People want them to add more features and make the product better, but at the same time they can't add those features because then they'd be ripping of another product. For example everyone said how ****ty IE was because it didn't have tabs. Then when they announced that there'd be tabs, everyone started whining about how FF and Opera always had tabs and were getting ripped off.

Nobody says anything about Firefox copying IE's information bar, menu layout, etc. They even changed the button positions from the original Mozilla to be more like IE. But really, who cares?!

I use whatever browser meets my needs the best. If IE can do that, then I'll try using it when it comes out.
#16 devyant on 25 Jun 2005 - 01:34
^ Agreed, I don't want to use a new browser and have to re-adapt to their "fresh" interface each and everytime. What we're looking is the functionality and security we demand, that they can provide.
#17 petroid on 25 Jun 2005 - 01:35
Looks very Longhorn-ish... Gimmiegimmiegimmie!
#18 dannymp3 on 25 Jun 2005 - 02:24
Hmm... nice little tease before the real thing.
#19 tagler on 25 Jun 2005 - 02:26
loghorn loves RSS......
.... can u say lame?
#20 k311 on 25 Jun 2005 - 03:04
uhmmm and this changes my opinion on IE how?
(6 replies) #21 nacs on 25 Jun 2005 - 04:14
Jesus christ that RSS thing is a carbon copy of the Safari RSS reader.

Microsoft 'innovation', gotta love it.
#21.1 PCyr on 25 Jun 2005 - 05:12
Except Firefox had it before Safari, and Netscape was the actual first browser to support it. So I guess MS is copying the copiers Nice try troll.
#21.2 kronik on 25 Jun 2005 - 05:30
#21.3 Wizz on 25 Jun 2005 - 09:16
Not really. Each of them have different implementations. The one reason why I can't more from Firefox to Safari is because Firefox uses LiveMarks where I can see all my RSS feeds on one toolbar. Safari uses this aggregation pages which are far more powerful but I just don't like em.
#21.4 nacs on 27 Jun 2005 - 02:05
QUOTE
Except Firefox had it before Safari


Nice try idiot. I was referring to the actual RSS parser in Safari. Get Safari, go to an RSS enabled site and hit the "RSS" button in the address bar and you'll see what I mean.

I'll keep it simple and use pictures since you seem to be a bit slow:
Safari RSS: here
Longhorn RSS: here


Last edited by 22516 on 27 Jun 2005 - 02:13
#21.5 rm20010 on 27 Jun 2005 - 02:49
Very nice. So do the browsers Firefox and Opera. They have the same f***ing feature.

As someone pointed out earlier about Firefox taking IE's yellowish information bar, as long as it satisfies the users, who gives a damn about copying. Go ahead and defend Safari as much as you like - we really don't care.
#21.6 PCyr on 27 Jun 2005 - 04:38
At least I don't need to use childish insults to support my point. I guess you actually need to resort to it for support

For RSS reading:

Safari 2.0 integrated RSS and came out in April 29, 2005 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safari_%28web_browser%29

Firefox 1.0 had RSS and came out in November 9, 2004 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox

Netscape still had it first.

As for the looks:

I'm the idiot because I can't read your mind because you're not clear in what your saying?
Here's an idea, say what you actually mean next time, but no, actually trying to make a clear point wouldn't be trolling now would it?

Last edited by 76276 on 27 Jun 2005 - 04:45
#22 Rodrigo on 25 Jun 2005 - 04:15
Smooth!

And I don't use safary, as long as it is on IE I will use it.

Smooth!
(4 replies) #23 benz240 on 25 Jun 2005 - 04:28
too little, too late. MS you lose, just give it up, youre another dying dinosaur like IBM
#23.1 Matt on 25 Jun 2005 - 04:49


all who are complaining about the rss layout, dont you think it will be changed by the time the public beta is relased?
#23.2 Zeitgeist on 25 Jun 2005 - 04:50
Yeah, IBM is really about to go bankrupt.
#23.3 MajinDark on 25 Jun 2005 - 04:57
benz, make yourself useful and never come here again. Damn troll.
#23.4 mr_skrilla on 25 Jun 2005 - 08:19
I don't like you. The only reason I use ff is because of tabs and speed. Now IE will rule again
(2 replies) #24 Mithrandir07 on 25 Jun 2005 - 05:32
I'm still trying to see what the hell the PICTURES are of. They arent SCREENSHOTS. They took a picture of their monitor with a ****ing camera instead of using the nice print screen button on their keyboard and pasting it into paint and saving it as a jpeg or something for ****s sake. But lets take our time to upload the ****ing pictures from out little memory card and then upload it online. Ya, the images always look better when we do it that way dont they?
#24.1 machorro on 25 Jun 2005 - 06:29
well if you take the word as it is they are taking a SHOT of a SCREEN anyway, well you really want a screenshot as we normally see it why don't you ask them to send you the alpha or wichever state is right now and take the screenshots, oh wait they won't give it to you either
#24.2 elliot on 25 Jun 2005 - 08:06
Do the screenshots come from microsoft.com? Guess what, this wasn't meant to show off IE7. Look at the source, it's a video demonstrating RSS integration into Longhorn. Sites like bink.nu then took the pictures off of it.
#25 aadhu on 25 Jun 2005 - 05:42
IE7 might just be good! and all this about copying from this n that.. hehe imitation is a form of flattery u know.
#26 brianshapiro on 25 Jun 2005 - 05:44
re: search bar

first of all, most people dont realize, but you can already have the address bar in IE act as a search bar. you can change registry settings so that if you type "ggl neowin" it searches google for "neowin"

yea, of course if they want people to use it they shouldnt make its use so hard to modify and cryptic...

but i always liked the search sidebar better than a search bar anyway, because you can keep the list of links on the left pane while you open up windows in the right (or in new tabs as it may be). i hope they dont get rid of the search sidebar
(1 reply) #27 Mithrandir07 on 25 Jun 2005 - 05:46
I'm still trying to see what the hell the PICTURES are of. They arent SCREENSHOTS. They took a picture of their monitor with a ****ing camera instead of using the nice print screen button on their keyboard and pasting it into paint and saving it as a jpeg or something for ****s sake. But lets take our time to upload the ****ing pictures from out little memory card and then upload it online. Ya, the images always look better when we do it that way dont they?
#27.1 wildk on 25 Jun 2005 - 08:40
how would the person in the audience who took the pictures reach the print screen button anyway? Do you think that these might have been taken covertly? Do you even think?
(5 replies) #28 mr_demilord on 25 Jun 2005 - 08:29
QUOTE
Microsoft is going to beat the hell out of firefox... 90% of the people who use firefox use it because of the tabs and the speed... now IE will kill firefox just like it did Netscape...


Including activex wich is a huge security risk.
BTW not everyone is been able to run internet explorer
#28.1 SquareSoft0 on 25 Jun 2005 - 09:03
ActiveX is a very powerful and versatile technology, user ignorance is a huge security risk. Are you still confused about the two?
#28.2 mr_demilord on 25 Jun 2005 - 10:07
http://secunia.com/product/11/
#28.3 rm20010 on 25 Jun 2005 - 16:50
QUOTE
BTW not everyone is been able to run internet explorer


Unfortunately that's true. Pre XP systems are left out in this update to IE. Thus they're forced to use alternatives. (Well, if they're planning on using an updated browser.)
#28.4 Jugalator on 26 Jun 2005 - 17:43
QUOTE
ActiveX is a very powerful and versatile technology

Power and flexibility far too often comes at the cost of security and this is no exception.
#28.5 SquareSoft0 on 26 Jun 2005 - 20:29
Absolutely not, anyone with minimal Windows knowledge can choose which ActiveX controls to install or not. If you don't trust where it is coming from or who made it, then you have the choice to not install it. How is this at the cost of security?
(1 reply) #29 Chicane-UK on 25 Jun 2005 - 09:02
Sorry but.. all those UI changes have just made the browser look like Firefox and Safari.. unbelievable.

I'm not so quick to bash MS these days as they do have some good products, but that UI cloning is absolutely shameless!!
#29.1 SquareSoft0 on 25 Jun 2005 - 09:02
It would appear as though Firefox copied IE's UI, and these new changes are pushing it further away. Yet that would make too much sense and not involve any MS-bashing.
#30 Laser_iCE on 25 Jun 2005 - 10:10
I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say that not everyone is been able to run internet explorer? If in fact you mean that not everyone is able to run internet explorer, then I can almost assure you that there is [a lot] more people able to run internet explorer, than that are unable. This is proven in the statistical percentages of browser usage. I think that this is a very smart move by Microsoft. As some people have already said before, it doesn't matter if they're copying/stealing/borrowing ideas, because it's not like that are just going to implement the other ideas, they will implement and improve! I am definitely looking forward to this browser

Oh, btw, I use Opera <3 haha
#31 Jugalator on 25 Jun 2005 - 12:42
That's a whole lot of attention for one of many features already in most modern web browsers.

What's next -- "Longhorn loves PNG"?

That they spend so much effort on pushing *one* feature like this, that's not even new, tells me IE 7 may not be very innovative after all. :-/


Last edited by 21023 on 25 Jun 2005 - 12:47
(7 replies) #32 shockz on 25 Jun 2005 - 14:15
STOP THE TROLLING AND FLAMING.

THE NEWS COMMENTS FOLLOW THE SAME RULES AS THE FORUM.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES WILL RESULT IN BANS OR RESTRICTIONS.
#32.1 miniM3 on 25 Jun 2005 - 14:44
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Please ban me!!! me!!! me!!!
Oh, I dunno how I can live after that!
Pathetic......
#32.2 shockz on 25 Jun 2005 - 14:45
My job is to make sure people like you don't troll and flame on the site... because when you do it makes less enjoyable to read the site. All I have to do is press a few buttons and your gone. Thus making the trolling and flaming less. You might not think its a big deal... and it really isn't... but if I can simply make you go away by pressing the big ban button to stop the problems I will.

Call me pathetic again and your done posting here.

Last edited by 3351 on 25 Jun 2005 - 15:02
#32.3 mr_da3m0n on 25 Jun 2005 - 16:41
If you really *are* a mod, you come out as a bit of ... uh... I can't find a way to describe it, but it sounds a wee bit pathetic, the "Call me that again and you're done posting here" was gratuitous. I don't know, I am sure you did not mean it that way, but just so you know, it really sounds wrong.

On the other hand, these forums are going to hell lately.
#32.4 shockz on 25 Jun 2005 - 16:44
QUOTE
Call me that again and you're done posting here" was gratuitous.


If you called any other person that you'd get a warn too.

Since I already warned him in the post... and if he does it again. He's done posting for 3 days.

Simple as that.

When you deal with these people... playing nice isn't going to get you anywhere.
#32.5 miniM3 on 25 Jun 2005 - 21:48
removed

Last edited by 3351 on 25 Jun 2005 - 22:15
#32.6 Jugalator on 26 Jun 2005 - 17:43
QUOTE
When you deal with these people... playing nice isn't going to get you anywhere.

However, not doing it will not make others play nice either. They'll just give you more work at clicking your ban button. The only worse thing about trolls on a forum is moderators helping to spread a negative atmosphere in public. Just silently get rid of them and be done with it. People can read the rules.
#32.7 rm20010 on 27 Jun 2005 - 02:55
^ True. Same goes for those people who publicly announce they're telling a mod someone said (insert insults here). Just silently click the report button and keep quiet.

off