Steel
If you want to keep your tongue, don't lick me in the Winter!  SSHOLE |
Posts: 489 Registered: 10/14/2004 Offline
|
2/24/2006 at 16:12 |
WOOT!
Today is the big day! I imagine no rulings to be forthcoming  |
| |
LORDKAHUNA
Don't make me fuk your moustache  SSHOLEPosts: 1610 Registered: 8/5/2003 Offline
|
2/24/2006 at 16:34 |
(moved from Serious cause hay, it's not that serious)
____________________ the rice I had yesterday came out practically verbatim |
| |
JohnLenin
Putting the semen in amusement  SSHOLEPosts: 1016 Registered: 7/8/2005 Offline
|
2/24/2006 at 16:56 |
seriously
____________________ Marf> omg <3 u 4 ever |
| |
jwalker
Token Discordian  SSHOLEPosts: 946 Registered: 8/6/2005 Offline
|
2/24/2006 at 17:16 |
what's a RIM?
____________________ To the dog who has money, men say "My Lord Dog". |
| |
metatron
Fighting The Good Fight ™  SSHOLEPosts: 469 Registered: 4/12/2002 Offline
|
2/24/2006 at 17:26 |
jwalker: what's a RIM?
something you lick
____________________ "it's water out of your body" - vasudeva |
| |
HOBO
* b0bo has quit IRC ('Exit')  SSHOLEPosts: 1116 Registered: 3/19/2002 Offline
|
2/24/2006 at 17:31 |
metatron: jwalker: what's a RIM?
something you lick
WHY SHITE ON THIS SERIOUS THREAD?
On 2006-02-24 at 20:02:22, HOBO enjoyed furrysex
____________________ " I have never understood the female capacity to avoid a direct answer to any question." ~Spock~
|
| |
Steel
If you want to keep your tongue, don't lick me in the Winter!  SSHOLEPosts: 489 Registered: 10/14/2004 Offline
|
2/24/2006 at 18:09 |
Judge declines to issue injunction against RIM
BlackBerry service to continue to operate, but judge urges settlement |
| |
Steel
If you want to keep your tongue, don't lick me in the Winter!  SSHOLEPosts: 489 Registered: 10/14/2004 Offline
|
2/24/2006 at 18:12 |
I may be the only one who cares... but YAY!!
RIM Provides Update on Patent Reexamination Proceeding
WATERLOO, ONTARIO--(CCNMatthews - Feb. 24, 2006) -
All Patents Remaining In Dispute Have Been Rejected
Research In Motion (RIM) (NASDAQ:RIMM)(TSX:RIM) confirmed today that it has received a copy of a Final Office Action issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the "Patent Office") in the ex parte reexamination of NTP, Inc. Patent #5,436,960. This Final Office Action maintains the outright and complete rejection of all claims in the patent.
All of the 3 patents remaining in dispute in the NTP vs. RIM litigation have now been rejected based in part on prior art not considered in the 2002 trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Although NTP may appeal, the rejections reflect the final opinion of the Patent Office's Central Reexamination Unit that the 3 patents at issue in this case are invalid.
The final rejections were all based on multiple grounds, required unanimous agreement from a panel of 3 senior patent examiners and are expected to withstand all future appeals by NTP.
1) Patent #6,317,592 contains 6 of the 9 claims at issue in this case and all 6 claims were rejected in the Patent Office ruling disclosed by RIM on February 1, 2006.
2) Patent #6,067,451 contains 2 of the 9 claims at issue in this case and both claims were rejected in the Patent Office ruling disclosed by RIM on February 22, 2006.
3) Patent #5,436,960 contains the last of the 9 claims at issue in this case and that claim was rejected in the Patent Office ruling disclosed today.
|
| |