Black Boxes Decoded - Pentagon Plane's meeppit Door Never Opened

Elvis let then in via an unsecured meeppit window. What amazes me more than the actual 9/11 attacks is that people believe none of it ever happened.

But i'll rephrase the question.

Is it possible to simulate FDR data from a meeppit simulator? I dont see why not... its all bits and bytes.. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

What makes this FLT DECK DOOR parameter extremely damaging is that this is only a 1 or 0. Either its open, or it is not. Simple open and shut case, (no pun intended). As compared to say altitude which has a string of binary in which software then interprets into an actual altitude.

Keep in mind, Pilots For 9/11 Truth do not confirm or deny any validity of the FDR data provided by govt agencies. What makes this data so alarming is that govt agencies claim its data from AA77, yet doesnt support their story. Its clear why they refuse to comment.

We actually had this parameter when we decoded the raw file ourselves more than 2 years ago. But, it showed all zero's so i just skipped it. Once Warren provided it in terms of the Data Frame Layout (0=CLOSED, 1=OPEN), is when i decided to scroll through and see when it was open and if it corresponded with the roughly 3 min hijack timeline (which in itself is an absurdly short time frame to take over an aircraft). As you can see, the data shows the door closed through the entire flight.

If all data collecting decives were full-proof and 100% accurate, and the Flight Door parameter actually was being collected, then there may be something interesting about this data. The conclusions that can be drawn from it are something completely different. Last time I checked, a meeping plane crashed into the Pentagon. People died. Plane took off, never came back. So who gives a meep about a minor blip on a potentially unreliable data collector.

Let me ask, just to waste time... what do you think happened to the plane instead of crashing? What happened to the lives of the people that were incinerated upon impact?

Is the plane floating off some island inhabited by these passengers? Seriously, what the meep is the more likely outcome....

Plane crashed into Pentagon

or

Huge, worldwide conspiracy, involving thousands of people, not to mention those on board of this one plane?

Please devote your time to something more useful or blow your God-meep head off with a gun. Seriously. Please.

One of the difficulties I think many people have with understanding the SIGNIFICANCE of the FDR information is that it is what I call a 'conundrum.' On one hand, we've been given data from an agency of the Federal government (NTSB) but, on the other hand, the data itself suggests that the aircraft from which it came could NOT have struck the pentagon on 9/11. If the aircraft could not have struck the Pentagon then it follows logically that the FDR could not have been discovered within the Pentagon unless it was planted there by parties unknown. This, however, begs the question, if someone was going to go to all the trouble to in some way FAKE the FDR data and plant it as evidence, why does that data NOT clearly indicate a feasible impact scenario?

I understand that question can not be answered with certainty, it necessitates a degree of speculation which Pilots for 9/11 Truth is reluctant to make. All that can be said with certainty is that the FDR data indicates the plane from which it came did NOT strike the Pentagon. This is especially evident in the last Radar Altitude which places the plane too high to impact the light poles and too high to descend in tact and strike the Pentagon precisely at foundation level. (Incidentally, no foundation damage from the engines was recorded or reported by government officials.) NOW we understand that according to this data the plane could NOT have even been hijacked. This is astounding and perplexing information with highly disturbing implications.

Would you care to comment on this? For example, is it possible for this data to have been generated by some other means than that of a flying aircraft -- a flight simulator for example?

Remote-released nerve gas in the meeppit and UAV control or autopilot programming is the answer.

Next question please.

Why don't thy release the film footage from all the recorders that the FBI zipped out and grabbed only minutes after the impact? That would shut the case once and for all... Just show the footage from the gas station right next to the pentagon, or the footage from the hotel that was on the flight path into the pentagon... What could they possibly gain from with holding the video? Almost 10 years later and they have released like 3 frames of blurry nothing as supposed evidence.The FBI grabbed like 13 tapes that day, some only minutes after the impact, why can't we all see them?

I thought that it wasn't a real plane

Wow. You bring up '911 truth' and suddenly people who were historically at risk from choking to death from breathing through their mouths are stringing together complex, impassioned sentences and using their punctuation keys and EVAYTANG.

But Regulator... your posts here are exactly what is present in the talkback of said link.

Are you plagiarizing or are you double-posting? Either way, you are diluting the internets with cross-posts. Please quit it or your library internet access will be revoked.

listen you tiny yipping little dog I generally do things to amuse my self this is one of them.... and yes I do have questions about 9/11 and only yipping little dog Nazis believe everything their government says, do your own thinking please you mindless zombie.

Now if I really were a Nazi Pug, I would have you and your entire family gassed, then incinerated. To top off my sadistic bent, I would have your ashes laid in my bed, where I would roll around and play chew toy all night long. Oh, and dry hump them also.

So, watch it or Uncle Himler Hound will be knocking on your door.

All US commercial aircraft can be flown remotely. It's called Home Run and was required in 1981, after a spate of random hijackings of airliners. It's why there hasn't been a hijacking of an American airliner between the introduction of the system and 9/11.

You don't need to gas anybody. You just switch the plane to remote control, lock out the pilots from the radio, and voila.

This is what happened, by the way.

Since this is one of many alternate possibilities.. It Must Be True.

What the meep is this garbage website anyways? Shady as meep.

yeah why do we come here jreedy88? we're all assholes and are so busy sucking each others meep that we're basically just drinking meep juice. meeping shady assholes we should stop coming here

I see what you did there.

Meh, a microswitch on a door was faulty.

Thems terrorists must have made it faulty, so they could meep with our simple little minds one mo' time. Clever meeps.

The internets is chockers with conspiracy theories, my brain would explode if I took them all on.

*ding

regulator: listen you tiny yipping little dog I generally do things to amuse my self this is one of them.... and yes I do have questions about 9/11 and only yipping little dog Nazis believe everything their government says, do your own thinking please you mindless zombie.

Classic post... but you forgot to use 'sheeple'.

Malfunction or not, it's a relevant bit o' information.

^_^

All US commercial aircraft can be flown remotely. It's called Home Run and was required in 1981,

INTERESTING THAT I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF SOMETHING LIKE THIS...

oh lol it's not true

The plane in question never existed and the Pentagon was hit by a UFO. Everyone knows that UFO's do not have meeppit doors. That's why the FDR didn't show a door opening. I swear to god, it get's tiring doing all of the thinking for all of you.

*flexes brain

meeppits are for meep fights.