linkswarm
queue: New link: Disney accidentally invents paperman method
spod
linkswarm
queue: New link: Dirty Bomb Blows Liberty
JohnLenin
turn it into a meep first
HOBO
on Charities: Not ALWAYS a scam...I mean; not like, EVERY TIME.: I just found a+
spod
LINK: My Dad Was in a Band
spankerchi+
How the meep do you keep a sammich fresh while shipping it to NC?
spankerchi+
on Charities: Not ALWAYS a scam...I mean; not like, EVERY TIME.: [@HOBO](http://www.l+
spankerchi+
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: Sorry, but with your+
spankerchi+
on Can the Gamification of Female Masturbation Remove Its Social Stigma?:
[@tesco](http://ww+
dragonstaf+
on Charities: Not ALWAYS a scam...I mean; not like, EVERY TIME.: [@HOBO](http://www.l+
LOki
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: ^ Still thinks "meep+
LOki
on Cold fusion, maybe p'raps?: OK, so methane on+
linkswarm
queue: New link: The NSA and the One Percent
tesco
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: Well, recently I+
tesco
on Can the Gamification of Female Masturbation Remove Its Social Stigma?: Spanker, that is+
middle_age+
on Charities: Not ALWAYS a scam...I mean; not like, EVERY TIME.: Ma, ma my bologna!
HOBO
on Charities: Not ALWAYS a scam...I mean; not like, EVERY TIME.: I like sandwiches!
middle_age+
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: [@spankerchief](http+
linkswarm
queue: New link: Art for Art's Sake: Huge Kinetic Wind Sculptures
Crapalicio+
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: such a bunch of+
dragonstaf+
on Can the Gamification of Female Masturbation Remove Its Social Stigma?: [@tesco](http://www.+
spankerchi+
spankerchi+
on Can the Gamification of Female Masturbation Remove Its Social Stigma?: The point being that+
spankerchi+
on Can the Gamification of Female Masturbation Remove Its Social Stigma?: Jees, tesco. This+
spankerchi+
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: You really seem to+
tesco
on Can the Gamification of Female Masturbation Remove Its Social Stigma?: meep! I figured out+
tesco
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: Spanker+
freakmachi+
spankerchi+
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: /mildly meandering+
spankerchi+
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: All political+
tesco
on Cold fusion, maybe p'raps?: OK, so methane on+
tesco
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: My bad, Dragon. I+
spankerchi+
on Spanky's Pic Place: On the plus side;+
spankerchi+
on Spanky's Pic Place: Thanks a LOT, man.+
MstrLance
on Spanky's Pic Place: 1. Apply clamps to+
spankerchi+
on Spanky's Pic Place: I can't help but+
spankerchi+
on Spanky's Pic Place: 2013061612095073410FEth.jpg
MstrLance
Happy non-negligent jizzer day!
JohnLenin
Pats on the meep all 'round
JohnLenin
Yeah, congrats on jizzing inside of something and then not letting your mistake die from negligence.
spankerchi+
Happy Anniversary to all my fellow apostates of the rythm method! Clutch your bag of peas PROUDLY!
LOki
on Cold fusion, maybe p'raps?: You make enough+
dragonstaf+
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: I do love the+
spankerchi+
on YouTube graveyard and cadaver exchange: http://www.youtube.c+
tesco
on Instagram blunder helps ID alleged thief: It is truly a+
tesco
on Why Libertarians Are Basically Cult Members: Logic is lost on+
tesco
on Cold fusion, maybe p'raps?: Loki You make enough+
tesco
on The man who quit money: Dragonstaff. It is+
linkswarm
queue: New link: My Dad Was in a Band
dragonstaf+
MstrLance
spankerchi+
It's time to get busy.
spankerchi+
Cleaning the garage this morning so's I have room to build. I gritted my teeth and threw out all the old bits of armor, too-heavy maille(10-12 gauge) and a sword blank I'll never get around to beveling.
LOki
on Spanky's Pic Place: HAHAHA! You'd be a+
linkswarm
queue: New link: Charities: Not ALWAYS a scam...I mean; not like, EVERY TIME.
spankerchi+
on Spanky's Pic Place: Oh, speaking of+
spankerchi+
on Spanky's Pic Place: Obviously you doubt+
LOki
on Spanky's Pic Place: tesco torque+
LOki
on Spanky's Pic Place: Perpetual+
spankerchi+
on Spanky's Pic Place: We're having new+
MstrLance
on YouTube graveyard and cadaver exchange: http://www.youtube.c+
dragonstaf+
on Spanky's Pic Place: [@LOki](http://www.l+
dragonstaf+
on Spanky's Pic Place: [@spankerchief](http+
linkswarm
queue: New link: Graham Chapman: A very naughty boy
LOki
on Spanky's Pic Place: Nothing, according+
spankerchi+
on Spanky's Pic Place: What really makes it+
spankerchi+
on Spanky's Pic Place: Can someone tell me+
LOki
on He Puts His Visions Into Our World: This is why I+
middle_age+
on He Puts His Visions Into Our World: I am so looking+
Senor_Smok+
on WWII VD ads.: Ouch
LOki
on Spanky's Pic Place: The Doctors were+
BeachGoat
graycube
dragonstaf+
LINK: Esther Williams-DED





Nov21 '10
posts
26.9k rads
26930 rads
#
Nov21 '10
posts
26.9k rads
26930 rads
#
Nov20 '10
posts
2526 rads
2526 rads
#
Nov20 '10
posts
13.6k rads
13636 rads
#
Makes me want to go back to school.
Nov20 '10
posts
2526 rads
2526 rads
#
uploader didn't want to upload this for whatever reason
uploaded elsewhere since imagemeep doesn't like nice things.
ps: your meep smells delicious
On 2010-11-20 at 23:49:16, sunny77 asked to smell your meep
Nov20 '10
posts
2526 rads
2526 rads
#
looks like a good time for all parties involved
Nov20 '10
posts
25.3k rads
25296 rads
#
For whom?
Nov20 '10
posts
0 rads
0 rads
#
Now, this just looks uncomfortable!
Nov20 '10
posts
55.2k rads
55157 rads
#
Delicious synchronicity.
Nov20 '10
posts
2526 rads
2526 rads
#
Nov19 '10
posts
26.9k rads
26930 rads
#
<img src=http://example.com/filename.gif>
On 2010-11-19 at 21:39:46, MstrLance asked to smell your meep
Nov19 '10
posts
25.3k rads
25296 rads
#
Nov19 '10
posts
15.6k rads
15577 rads
#
CLAVOEDIT: To alleviate Dismas' suffering from acute retardation.
On 2010-11-20 at 01:15:50, Clavis_Apocalypticae asked to smell your meep
Nov18 '10
posts
9545 rads
9545 rads
#
I SWEAR she didn't look like that back at the bar.
Nov18 '10
posts
55.2k rads
55157 rads
#
Nov16 '10
posts
46.9k rads
46882 rads
#
^ This.
To my knowledge, Wankel never made a piston radial. His claim to fame was the design of the rotary. I only know any of this because the very first model I ever built was a scale Wankel Rotary with lights for plugs and a clear crank case so you could watch that beautiful meeping design actually work.
Nov16 '10
posts
1840 rads
1840 rads
#
Brainfart. Thanks for the correct. I mix those up sometimes because of this:
Nov16 '10
posts
105 rads
105 rads
#
That'd be a radial, not a rotary.
Nov16 '10
posts
1840 rads
1840 rads
#
What god posted is a rotary engine. Common misconception. A Wankel is a rotary, but a rotary is not a Wankel, in a sense.
Nov16 '10
posts
15.6k rads
15577 rads
#
facial fail FTW
Nov16 '10
posts
46.9k rads
46882 rads
#
Stupits.
Nov16 '10
posts
46.9k rads
46882 rads
#
Wankles didn't have pistons. You are all retardeds. Please stop retardeding.
Nov16 '10
posts
2526 rads
2526 rads
#
Nov15 '10
posts
21.4k rads
21439 rads
#
I thought Mitsubishi or somebody used wankels on the Japanese zero's during WW1 but I guess it was something more like this.

Nov15 '10
posts
9545 rads
9545 rads
#
:Vomits noisily:
Nov14 '10
posts
31.3k rads
31323 rads
#
Nov13 '10
posts
1788 rads
1788 rads
#
Wankels are notoriously unreliable, especially the 13a. They stepped it up with the 13b in the late 80's but when they went twin turbo with it the reliability went back to meep. The amazing thing about the wankel's is the power to displacement/weight ratio. The early 90's twin turbo's were a 1.3 litre engine that put out close to 260HP stock and I've seen 400-500HP numbers after significant modding. That's ridiculous. There are bigger motors found in most harleys. I don't know how the RX-8's are in terms of reliability, though they can't be much worse then the early 90's TT's. An elegant design for a motor, though it took them nearly 30 years to make a reliable version of it.
Nov13 '10
posts
31.3k rads
31323 rads
#
Nov13 '10
posts
1788 rads
1788 rads
#
This is how fox's and coyotes hunt for rodents in the winter. The rodents stay under the snow and close to the ground where it's actually a lot warmer. The hunter will listen for them and then pounce through the crust of the snow to catch 'em. Neat stuff!
Nov13 '10
posts
7576 rads
7576 rads
#
Nov13 '10
posts
31.3k rads
31323 rads
#
Nov13 '10
posts
31.3k rads
31323 rads
#
Nov12 '10
posts
55.2k rads
55157 rads
#
Nov11 '10
posts
1840 rads
1840 rads
#
They did that? That's retarded. I wonder why it wasn't very popular.
Nov11 '10
posts
105 rads
105 rads
#
I was posting more of a general review. Mazda did offer a pickup with a 13b and they even rebranded some 3500lb Holden's and put the 13b in there... My old '89 F150 only weighed about 300lbs more than that.
[insert awesome gif here]
-=Whittey=-
Nov11 '10
posts
1840 rads
1840 rads
#
I'm 6'6". I takes what I can gets in which I can fits.
Nov11 '10
posts
31.3k rads
31323 rads
#
thanks for the replies, whittey and richard parker. i figured there had to be some major reason.
Nov11 '10
posts
1840 rads
1840 rads
#
I don't find the torque thing to be an issue- rotaries are typically built light (plus wankels are naturally significantly lighter than piston engines) to counteract that. I mean, you obviously wouldn't put a rotary in your heavy-duty truck or SUV, but I never understood why people drive those to their office jobs, anyway.
The fuel efficiency also tends not to be much of an issue- buying an RX means your car is lighter than the car you probably would have bought, so it almost evens out. I barely noticed a difference between my RX-7 and my 6-cyl Monte Carlo, and it didn't appreciably effect my wallet.
Also, I know this isn't widely applicable, but many people find its unreliability to be an upside. I was really excited when I came back from vacation once and realized I forgot to ask someone to drive my RX-7 a few times while I was away. The apex seal cracked, which meant total engine rebuild! w00t!
They are definitely expensive to produce, though.
In the end, if you enjoy cars, and you think wankels are cool or interesting, it's well worth the extra coin- especially if you enjoy working on engines.
Nov11 '10
posts
105 rads
105 rads
#
They're inefficient and expensive to manufacture. Reliability can be an issue (queue someone saying how a friends friend had 2 million miles on their 1200hp rx7). They're also generally have little low end torque.
Wikipedia's advantages/disadvantages section is only moderately fanboyish and might be worth a read.
-=Whittey=-
Nov10 '10
posts
31.3k rads
31323 rads
#
someone with engineering knowledge:
why don't more cars use a rotary engine?
On 2010-11-10 at 21:05:20, nocal asked to smell your meep